3/3/2023 0 Comments Parasite eve junk![]() Introns are internal segments within genes that are removed when DNA is transcribed into mRNA prior to protein synthesis. There are four principal types of junk DNA (i.e. The non-coding-DNA contains the ‘switches’ that regulate up to 80% of the genome. The whole junk DNA debacle has sabotaged medical research for over 40 years! We need desperately to stimulate the development of new therapies to prevent and treat diseases. This has enormous implications for health care costs and understanding disease mechanisms. For example, reasons for different forms of cancer and autism may stem from DNA outside the genes. ![]() It is now becoming evident that many illnesses are linked to mutations in the non-protein-coding DNA, since only a few rare illnesses can be attributed directly to genes alone. Junk DNA helps scientists to better understand how the genome can affect human health ![]() This non-protein-coding DNA directs the use of other information in the genome and regulates protein-coding gene function. Therefore, ‘junk DNA’ is far from being useless remnants left over from past recessive mutations, as materialistic models asserted. ![]() 6 This demonstrated that the vast majority of the human genome is functional. This evidence for evolution was finally eradicated (or should have been) with the publication of the ENCODE project’s first results ( Enc yclopedia o f D NA E lements) in 2012. That nearly all the DNA is now known to be functional puts genetic entropy firmly back on the table and supports recent creation. However, it is not conceivable that novelties could arise from experimenting on existing functions. 5 If evolution were true, the DNA would indeed be saturated with remnants of failed experimental attempts at the production of novel enzymes and functions. A major objection from some of them, delivered with great confidence, was that junk DNA proved evolution-end of story. In the recent book, Heretic, biochemist Matti Leisola tells of an encounter with students from Fribourg University when he was lecturing in 2008 in Switzerland about evolution’s molecular-level problems. Origin of life expert Leslie Orgel and Francis Crick (co-discoverer of the structure of DNA) stated in 1980, “Much DNA in higher organisms is little better than junk and can be compared to the spread of a not-too-harmful parasite within its host.” 2 And evolutionary biologist Douglas Futuyma declared in 2005, “Only Darwinian evolution can explain why the genome is full of ‘fossil’ genes.” 3 It is now becoming evident that many illnesses are linked to mutations in the non-protein-coding DNA, since only a few rare illnesses can be attributed directly to genes alone.Įventually this belief about the majority of DNA being the useless leftovers (or vestiges) from evolution trickled down to the general population geneticist Francis Collins, in arguing for evolution, was particularly influential in promoting the idea of junk DNA in his popular 2006 book The Language of God although he has since backtracked on his junk DNA claims. Year after year this view has been repeated by other researchers. “The simplest way to explain the surplus DNA is to suppose that it is a parasite, or at best a harmless but useless passenger, hitching a ride in the survival machines created by the other DNA.” 1
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |